0 votes

4 Answers

0 votes
by (2.4k points)
Of a good time. Profanity doesn't bother me, poking fun at harmless human idiosyncrasies, as this book seems to . have to ponder reading this one. Thanks for the review. Personally, I was expecting to read one hundred annoying. of profanity that you described. Thanks for the honest review. Thank you for stopping by, Cecilia! Lunastella wrote: ↑02 . 'll pass on this one. Thanks for the candid review! I totally understand! I appreciate your time, Crystal! kendallcurrier . or improving those stories that seem more judgmental than humorous would bring the book closer to a more pleasant . based on such an approach. Thanks for the wonderful review. Talks about animal abuse? Well that sparks up my. these annoying habits brought a colourful nuance to the sarcastic tone. It was just a bit too much for .
0 votes
by (2.6k points)
[Following is the official OnlineBookClub.org review of "Getting Rich Quick: A Four Part Guide for the . -help book, don’t be. This is a book that pokes fun at those types of books, while causing the reader to. commonly used to mean money. I want to start this review off on the right note, by diving directly into the. anyway, you might just find that the authors style is humorous and enjoyable. This book contains somewhat of a plot. As. only difference in this book (besides the fact this book pokes fun at the others) is that this book follows a main. have a sarcastic sense of humor then you will certainly get a charge out of “Getting Rich Quick”. Dewi expertly pokes fun at your. . I would highly recommend this book for those with a sarcastic sense of humour or for those who are looking for.
0 votes
by (2.9k points)
Book, and wrote a pretty sarcastic review making fun of the book. I decided that a humorous review poking fun at the book was . better than a "straight" review that slammed the book. But. , and stick by the original opinion. Understand, book reviews definitely affect sales, and therefore are meaningful in . 've done this for years. But for book reviews, the review must be fair and unbiased. If for example. I would totally disagree with. Some high-level reviewers slammed Cormac McCarthy's stunning novel "Blood Meridian" . , some of their reviews are boring. I prefer reviews from "causal" people who write for the fun of it, not. out by myself. As a side remark, "unprofessional" reviewers may write just as well as "professional" ones. .
0 votes
by (2.2k points)
Again.I agree subjectivity does shine through any book review. To those who say that subjectivity is inherent . in any review because the reviewer is human, and it's impossible to therefore . write an objective review, let me discuss the difference. Of COURSE we're . sedate style. Two ways to do this: A bad review: "The novel "Haunted Castle" was simply boring. Nothing . of reading after the first few chapters." Here the reviewer conceals a preference for the action style and . be helpful, not hurtful. I've read many reviews where the reviewer is just mean because he/she did not . should not be however treated hatefully. Perhaps a humorously sarcastic review which pokes fun? That would be acceptable. You guys are scaring .
Welcome to Books Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...